The People Versus Lady Macbeth :: essays research papers

The People Vs. Macbeth The Macbeth trial broke out in full force today as the entire nation of Scotland paid close attention to the small town court of Grahacknboroughsly, Scotland. The charges are for abuse of power, abuse of wealth, abuse of friendship and misuse of a regal Scottish accent. As the parade of people came into the courthouse, 2/3rds of them were enemies of Macbeth. The motion to dismiss came early on grounds of permanent death on Macbeth’s defense team. The motion was quickly dismissed as Macbeth was being quite lively for a dead King. The motion was not helped by the â€Å"deceased† ordering the judge to â€Å"Lemme free, drop the charges and get a haircut.† The defense motion was further weakened by the comment, â€Å"the judge can kiss my giant, royal behind.†   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The trial soon got underway after the court was able to settle Macbeth down. The People’s witness list started off at the top and worked down. The first was Banquo, as he had been victimized by Macbeth early in the tale and his testimony, as well as his casket, was getting stale. After hearing the testimony from Banquo, the Macbeth defense brought out their one and only witness, a stable boy, who looked as though he had been threatened with his life. The boy’s shaky and unseemingly well worded testimony went over very badly on the jury side and the crowds side. The boy brought out the fact that Macbeth was blinded by the possibility of absolute power and wealth, and that he couldn’t control his wife’s demands until it was too late for the both of them. He also stated that the opportunity wouldn’t have been there if it weren’t for the king’s cowardly sons and their flight from Scotland. This did not go over well for the side of the jury that was strongly pro Duncan (even though they were supposed to be non partisan, it was hard to find a soul who didn’t love Duncan so much as to hate Macbeth.)   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The People now brought out the Weird sisters and their cauldron to make their testimony. As cryptic as it was, it revealed that they had convinced Macbeth to kill Duncan, even though it was not hard. The jury was heavily swayed by this revelation, the common thought was that it may not have been Macbeth’s fault. The sisters may have convinced him.

Christian Reflection-Motivation Essay

Being in the box has a negative impact on an individual’s internal and external motivation in the workplace. We lose our â€Å"what-focus and who-focus† because we are too occupied with justifying the characteristics we have created in our minds. (The Arbinger Institute, 2002) For example when I was an intern in the civil rights office, my first rotation was with the only diversity specialist. She had a fairly poor attitude but was excellent at the work that she produced. She insisted that employees should overlook her attitude and focus on the point she was making. Over time I watched as her approach to interacting with her co-workers slowly escalated into arguments and the refusal to work with her. People wanted clear boundaries for what their responsibilities were versus the diversity specialist. Other people in the office lost motivation or developed a very short temper with the diversity specialist. The civil rights office could not work together to accomplish any group tasks if they were paired with this individual. However it was the civil rights division that suffered as a whole. Upper management noticed the internal discord and lost trust in the office. Internally I am positive that each employee blamed someone else for the loss of trust within the office. My office is a very great example of â€Å"collusion,†each person continues to act according to the characteristics they are placing on themselves and co-workers to justify not working as a team. (The Arbinger Institute, 2002) I am also guilty of shying away from working with the diversity specialist. There were times when I could have stepped in to help her out but I refused to volunteer due to some of our interactions, I truly felt justified in my thinking also. Although I know that my Christian beliefs/values should have a positive affect on internal and external motivation in the workplace. I also know that this positive affect is accomplished by ensuring that I behave in a manner that would be pleasing to God. However, that is not always the case. Sometimes a Christian will know the right thing to do but will ignore their inner spirit. It is challenging to offer someone that last bit of advice that will make a difference in their project when they constantly belittle your suggestions or take credit for the work you do. Christians must remind themselves that their rewards will come from God, not man. Motivation has a huge impact on the amount of conflict in the workplace. When people are motivated in a positive manner to interact with co-workers and employees, you have a positive, productive work environment. However when you have a few people â€Å"in the box† it has a negative domino affect on the work environment. (The Arbinger Institute, 2002) People want to leave early and only produce what is required of them. As blame begins to shift to everyone around them, there is a loss of motivation to go the extra mile or be helpful to others. References The Arbinger Institute (2002). Leadership and Self-Deception. Sand Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers

A Discource Around Freedom Of Speech - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 10 Words: 2967 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/05/18 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Freedom of Speech Essay Did you like this example? The freedom of speech remains as one of the fundamental elements of the foundation of the United States of America. Ultimately, it has protections under the American Constitution in line with the First Amendment. It reads, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances (Legal Information Institute). In recent times, due to increased instances of hate speech and other negative elements, there has also been an increase in the debate on the issue regarding freedom of speech. This includes the idea of whether it is absolute and should speech have restrictions. This polarizing debate goes against those who feel that the freedom of speech is an absolute, which protects every citizens right to speak freely without any government interference or censure, against those that feel that freedom of speech is a right. However, there is the controversial idea that the need to have legal limits to discourage vices, such as hate speech and obscenities is missing. In this context, the paper will argue that free speech is an absolute right that should not have limits since this standpoint will be an attack on the spirit of the American Constitution and the right for everyone to express themselves fully without either fear or censure. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Discource Around Freedom Of Speech" essay for you Create order The idea of freedom of speech came into the American way of life through the founding fathers who introduced the Bill of Rights and through the First Amendment, which guaranteed the right of every American to speak their minds without fear. While the amendment does not explicitly define what it means by the freedom of speech and what can or cannot be protected, over the years, this role has been provided by the courts. The judicial system in America has provided a number of landmark rulings that have set the tone of the debate on whether the freedom of speech should or should not have limits. The earliest example occurred in the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1919, the case of Schenck versus the United States. Charles Schenck, a general secretary, of the Socialist Party was opposed to the the the military draft. In retaliation, the socialist sent 15,000 leaflets, that instructed for any man drafted for war to resist. The underlying issue was did this act of espionage violate the First Amendment? The court ruled the Espionage Act was constitutional, freedom of speech was not an absolute right and civil liberties might have limits in times of war, especially when the speech may present some form of danger to the general good. On the other hand, the 1942 Chaplinsky versus New Hampshire saw the Supreme Court uphold that the right to free speech was limited in circumstances where there is the use of words or phrases that may cause injury or cause an immediate breach of the peace (Bill of Rights Institute). A more recent case, which includes the 2004 case of Morse versus Frederick, saw the Supreme Court rule that in some cases, the right to freedom of speech can be limited if its intent goes against an illegality. In this case, a students right to hold a banner that read ?Bong Hits 4 Jesus could not be protected. Unfortunately, while it was his right to offer the speech, this right was outweighed by the schools rule that barred encouraging drug use. These court cases provide an insight into the manner in which the judicial system has tried to interpret the First Amendment and, thus, shedding more light on the debate on whether it should have limitations or not. Free speech should have no limits because placing limits hampers resolution of an issue or an idea through debate. It is important to note that everybody has ideas and opinion that may contradict one another. However, this can vary based on religion, morals and ones values. In some cases, those ideas, thoughts, and opinions may not be politically correct and be widely unpopular. Needless to say, it is important that a person is given the right to express those ideas without any limits to enable them and others to be receptive to new information. It would be very catastrophic if limits forced people to keep their thoughts and feelings inside, no matter how unpopular or wrong they may be to other people. This position occurs because having different opinions and being able to express that without any limits helps to foster debate, which, in many cases, can help to persuade the opposed of either being wrong or show them their ignorance to real facts. When society encounters an individual or a group that has opinions or thoughts that are offensive and ignorant, it would be better to challenge them to express themselves and give evidence rather than just silence them through enacting limits. When put up for debate, the explanation offered is up for examination, weaknesses, and flaws can be exposed, thus, making people realize why they are wrong. Supporters of limitations may argue that in some instances, it is very clear who is right and who is wrong or it is common knowledge what is offensive and what is not offensive. Therefore, the audience would emphasize there is no need for a debate to rationalize that aspect. However, this argument is very sectarian and encourages the formation of the ?other as well as encouraging narrow-mindedness (see Fig 1). It ignores the value of showing why somebody is wrong through an open and rational debate. Rationally, free speech should have no limits because that position allows good ideas to be expressed and implemented while bad ones can go through a debate and, therefore, be questioned productively. Free speech already has limits and there is no need to restrict it further as this standpoint will be an attack on the spirit of the Constitution. It is already well known that the Supreme Court has acknowledged that in some circumstances, it may be necessary to put limits to free speech through the interpretation of the First Amendment. This instance occurs in cases that may lead to violence or cause a disturbance to peace. As a result, the Supreme Court holds that there exist special categories under which the First Amendment may not protect freedom of speech in some contexts. These categories of expression are words deemed to be obscene, words deemed to be defamatory, words deemed to be commercial, and words deemed to be fighting words or disruptive expression (OBrien). Therefore, it is evident that free speech in its nature is already limited since it is logical to accept the fact that in some circumstances, there is no value achieved from some kind of free speech that is outrigh t unacceptable in both legal and social realms. However, any further limits beyond these accepted restrictions are in bad faith and exhibit an undemocratic attack on the Constitution and the First Amendment, which guarantee every American the right to free speech. Audience that supports the idea of additional limits may argue that this outlook does not offer enough protection, and that it should go beyond these categories and offer limitations that do not allow people to say whatever they want at any given time. Additionally, they argue that these categories of limitations are vague and in most cases, allow people to get away with a lot. For instance, words that are obscene in nature need to be said with threatening language for them to be considered unprotected by the First Amendment. However, this argument appears to be restricted in nature because any further restrictions will make the right to free speech redundant. There would be no protection in speaking and expressing ones thoughts and ideas. The limitations that are alread y set in stone were planned out well enough due to past situations, that instilled restraints. Freedom of speech should not be limited because it has led, and will continue to lead, some of the most groundbreaking social changing movements. It is without a doubt that words are powerful and that they can, in many ways, inspires the human psyche and leads it to various ideas and convictions. In history, there are various examples where words of speech and the freedom to express them have resulted in meaningful changes that have played a part in the growth of humanity. These include the abolition of slavery, the civil rights movement, and the more recent #MeToo movement. If this right to freedom of speech had been hampered, Dr. Martin Luther King would not have been able to inspire a generation through his words to raise up peacefully against racial injustices. His words during those times were unpleasant to a majority of the white population and, therefore, if there were any limits to freedom of speech, he would not have achieved what he did. Similarly, not all the women victims in the #MeToo movement would have attained justice if the freedom of speech had limits, which would have prevented them from describing the sexual assaults. Therefore, freedom of speech is an important tool of social change that should not, in any way, be limited to encourage positive social engagement. Supporters of limitation would argue that free speech in the context of advocating for social change may be abused and misused and, therefore, it is necessary to have limits to ensure that there is the correct use of the right to free speech. However, this argument is flawed in the sense that in many ways, people who are advocating for a positive change are always on the right side of history. Therefore, citizens who are granted this right should use any means necessary to advocate for whatever they believe in through the most effective means, which in this case is the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech should not have limitations since it functions as one of the fundamental avenues to prevent the occurrence of oppression within society. Primarily, free speech establishes an armistice between diverse factions with opposing viewpoints, histories, principles, philosophies, faiths, and creeds. It allows every member of the society, the authority to uphold his or her perspective openly; hence, no one has the consent to subdue another. Consequently, free speech is an essential tool that provides a voice for the minorities and the burdened. It allows people to attain growth by questioning the establishment, the existing state of affairs, the rule of law, and the governing body. This freedom is necessary for the oppressed as well as those who inspire to challenge their stances and demands the idea of whether it creates an environment for refutation. For this reason, everyone has an equal playing field to oppose and counter various impractical standpoints. Eventually, free speech provokes an impartial, open, balanced, and sensible discourse on pertinent issues, particularly from those who would otherwise lack the space and opportunity to express themselves regarding the same (OLeary). Progressively, debate emerging from free speech can be fundamental in presenting gaps in development, hence, allowing room for additional research, sifting of backward concepts, reform, and persuasion from disadvantaged factions. Those who argue against the ability of free speech hinder oppression within the society claim that it presents an extremely huge threat. Their main disagreement with the stance stems from the belief that freedom of speech would only empower the influential faction of society further. Consequently, this dominant section will merely label any form of resistance from the others as sacrilege, deviation, undermining power, censure, and an affront to the essence of societal living. However, there is a possibility that the influential society would denounce free speech as a form of corruption. Such disapproval of freedom of speech disregards the spirit of the movement. It is irrational to discount it based on the assumption that it may provoke the emergence of rogue individuals within the society. In essence, the benefits of free speech are for oppressive movements outweigh the costs. Freedom of speech has been a crucial component in the growth and development of the current world as it exists; therefore, implementing limitations would merely curtail and stagnate global progression. Throughout the years, advancements in numerous fields across the globe have only been possible through the constant collaboration and interchange of thoughts and information between people across the continent. From this capacity, numerous groundbreaking inventions that make life easier in comparison to past years are effective. First world countries like those in Europe and the United States, as illustrated below, are ahead of the rest primarily because of the extensive range of discoveries and creations within these nations, which are attributable to the concept of freedom of speech (see Fig 2). World Economic Forum. Revolutionary discoveries in science and technology, such as cutting-edge transportation and communication infrastructure via electric-powered trains and cellular networks have become a reality due to the resourcefulness that emerges. As an outcome of the unrestricted movement of concepts and the nonexistence of the hindrances in unfamiliar, debatable, far-reaching, and rare thoughts and findings. Besides, all developments in these fields such as the arts are caused by peoples ability to express themselves without obstruction; hence, the existence of contemporary works of literature, entertainment, building and design, among others. All these advancements attest to the fact that freedom of speech serves as the foundation for all growth within the society, and the lack of development within others is dependent on their rules of censorship. Those who contest the standpoint that free speech is essential for growth and development within the society claim that it is not the only element necessary for the same outcome. For instance, other accompanying components such as cohesion, peace, and stability as the most fundamental preconditions for any advancing nation. They assert that these components precede free speech because it is not the main concern if the others are unavailable and unattainable. This form of reasoning is inaccurate in relation to the necessity of dialogue in the achievement of all the elements presented. To an acceptable degree, cohesion, peace, and stability cannot exist without the foundation of free speech. Freedom of speech is a crucial component of the basis for a self-governing society. In the contemporary world, free speech is a powerful tool in the sharing of perspectives and the spreading of information to the mass population. Free speech holds such immense power in the modern society that it can either abolish or institute entire civilizations. Presently, platforms such as social media websites are critical in uniting people against the administration; such as, countries with questionable leadership strategies have been victims of a strict system of checks and balances from citizens who engage each other on such sites freely. Naturally, freedom of speech allows citizens to question authority and have different viewpoints. The ability to engage with each other instantaneously without limitations ensures that the administration adheres to the principle of democracy. Besides, the philosophies contained within such discussions do not disappear due to the absence of suppression; thus, they serve to promote democracy in the long term. In essence, freedom of speech is obligatory not only to promotes such democratic principles but also to ensure the upholding of individual rights to distinct perspectives within the said democracy. Intention and communal discussion form the spirit of democracy. By restricting free speech, the citizens lack the capacity to attain and sustain control since they missed the opportunity to participate in constructive debate for the sake of their countrys autonomy. Those against free speech as a prerequisite of democracy within any given nation claim that the call for self-governance does not justify the necessity for the absence of limitations in freedom of speech. Even though they accept the rationality in the crucial nature of free speech in a democracy, they assert that restrictions are also necessary to regulate disorde r and lawlessness within the society, which may arise from political discourse. They echo the notion that controlled freedoms are not equivalent to eliminated ones. This argument is fragile since restrictions on free speech do not necessarily translate to the absence of political chaos. There will always be disagreement on political subjects; hence, limiting speech is not a guarantee for mutual understanding in opinion. Lastly, freedom of speech is a fundamental human right; meaning, limitations go against this basic provision. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, under Article 19, Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers (Global Freedom of Expression). From this declaration, it is a common logic to recognize that freedom of speech is as necessary to human survival as is any other basic right. It is the responsibility of everyone to ensure that they uphold this right as equivalent to the right to life, for instance. Furthermore, this proclamation raises the question regarding the essence of a right: it is revolutionary to impose constraints on elements that are integrally rights. In other words, freedom of speech is so essential to life that people fight to implement it throughout their lives and a re willing to die defending it. The capacity to express oneself in communal settings without anxiety in the essence of independent living. Consequently, effecting restrictions merely creates room for suppression and oppression, which are prone to enabling social biases. Those who disprove this standpoint claim that some level of censorship within the society is tolerable since it curtails the possibility of chaos due to over contribution from members of the society. However, this perspective is inaccurate since it overlooks the manner in which gagging people fuels unfamiliarity, misrepresentation, and the absence of up-to-date resolutions. In essence, freedom of speech is as imperative to sanity as other basic human rights.

Movie Analysis Superman - 2168 Words

Memories are hard. There was a time when you made her smile and your world lit up and you knew you loved her. A time when you’d leave for a trip and couldn’t contact her, but every time you came back you’d find all the messages she left to tell you about what you were missing in her day and to remind you that she loved you. A time when you’d both stay in and watch Netflix and there was that first time she fell asleep on you and you couldn’t help but watch her, cozy and innocent and happy. And then there was the time when you moved 1,007 miles away. She told you she’d wait for you, but she didn’t. You can still remember her ragged breaths as she said she didn’t want you to go and the smell of her hair and how it felt when she kissed you and everything reminds you of her and how you used to be. In his song, â€Å"Superman,† Eminem tells us the proper way to deal with difficult breakups: rather than dwelling on the past, he takes a Hakuna Matata standpoint and decides that it doesn’t matter anymore. Every relationship he entered fell through. The lyrics, â€Å"Don’t put out / I ll put you out. / Won’t get out / I ll push you out,† suggest that the problem wasn’t him: they were refusing to do what he wanted and he has the right to push them out the door if his basic needs aren’t fulfilled. Why should he put up with her if she’s only going to refuse to give him what he needs? She’s a hobby to him, not a profession. As he puts it, â€Å"But I do know one thing though: / bitches, they come theyShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Movie Waiting For Superman 1186 Words   |  5 Pages â€Å"Waiting for Superman† looks at a problem plaguing American schools all over the country today. This film makes it clear this problem hits hardest in the poorest communities of the country, he does make it clear though that it can happen in rich communities and suburbs.. The filmmakers attack all political parties and belief systems. The mov ie looks at many things , the funding of schools, how supplies are distributed to schools, how teachers are picked and monitored, teachers unions, differentRead MoreMovie Analysis : Waiting For Superman 1271 Words   |  6 Pagesgives you lemons, make lemonade: a clichà © that seems to be used oftentimes and never fails to humor some truth in it. In the television show, The Simpsons, episode: â€Å"How the Test Was Won,† directed by Lance Kramer and the documentary, Waiting for Superman, directed by Davis Guggenheim, indicates the depleted issue in our education system. Both texts argue the decline of our nation’s literacy and school merit that comes with. Ultimately, Guggeheim builds his credibility with citing reputable resourcesRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie Waiting For Superman 935 Words   |  4 PagesWaiting for Superman is a documentary that scrutinized public schools primarily located in inner-city areas. The documentary provided criticism towards educa tional reforms and the process of seeking alternative private or institutionalized education (i.e. charter schools). The film showcased the testimonies of five students and their desires to escape the failing public schools in the area. Waiting for Superman is metaphorically titled to suggest that a false sense of hope is given to studentsRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie Waiting For Superman 902 Words   |  4 PagesWaiting for â€Å"Superman† is a documentary that focuses on five children-Anthony, Bianca, Emily, Francisco, and Daisy- who are looking for a better outcome for their education. The film is set up to follow different stories to explain how the school system works and the different ways that each school district functions. In detail, it unravels the struggle of the American school system and how the roles of charter schools has increased. It shows the five different charter schools that each child wantsRead MoreAnalysis Of The Movie Waiting For Superman 1952 Words   |  8 PagesDanny kinder-key Waiting for Superman 2010 Mr. Davis Guggenheim—an American film director and producer wrote and directed Waiting for â€Å"Superman†, a documentary that deals with the American education system. Guggenheim argues that they are failing more each year in producing successful students. He finds where the faults are within the public educational system. He takes the time to show us some of the faces to those numbers to make his pubic realize they areRead MoreMovie Analysis : Waiting For Superman2121 Words   |  9 PagesAfter watching both â€Å"Waiting for Superman† at home and â€Å"Race to Nowhere† in class, a lot of conclusions can be made from both incredibly made documentaries. Both films offered their audience the opportunity to be informed about the problems and issues in contemporary American education, both clearly with two completely different points of view. â€Å"Waiting for Superman† and â€Å"Race to Nowhere† were both created in 2010, and here and no w in 2015, major issues in the United States surrounding educationRead MoreMovie Analysis : Superman, Batman, And Iron Man1495 Words   |  6 PagesMovies now a days such as the Avengers, Suicide Squad, and Captain America, value teamwork. In the films Superman, Batman, and Iron Man, they reveal how back in the early 2000’s America valued independence compared to these recent movies like the Avengers, Suicide Squad, and Captain America and how they value teamwork. In comparison to today’s superhero films, the Avengers are a collaboration between the marvel superheros who team up and try to stop the apocalypse from the aliens. Superhero filmsRead MoreBlade Runner Film Analysis800 Words   |  4 PagesBlade Runner: Film Analysis and Critics Review Blade Runner (1982), directed by Ridley Scott, combines the element, film noir and science fiction, thus creating a outstanding visual aesthetic that has been embraced by most critics. Based on Philip K. Dick’s novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968), many critics embraced this sci- fi film, although it leaves out a majority of the novel’s plot and themes while scenes are modified significantly. The plot follows police officer Rick DeckardRead MoreExamples Of Education In Waiting For Superman1242 Words   |  5 PagesA proper education is one of the most important things in a childs life. In the powerful documentary, Waiting for Superman, directed by Davis Guggenheim, the audience is given an insight on charter, public, and private/ boarding schools. While the underlying tones of the film are leaning towards the positives of these prestigious schools, the main principle is how important an education is, and the steps the country is taking to improve it. Thr oughout the film, a strong pull of emotion is presentedRead MoreVsdgvfyhb2024 Words   |  9 PagesWriter’s Reflection ​When I heard the assignment for Inquiry Two, I was quite excited. I had heard of â€Å"Waiting For Superman,† but had never really had the chance to watch it. The topic of it is something that I am extremely passionate about and was eager to learn more about. So I happily watched the documentary and quickly whipped out a first draft (rough rough draft) without even really having to think about it- the words just poured out. However, when writing my real rough draft, I tried to focus

Essay Dualism in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho - 1454 Words

The characters in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960) each have a dual nature that is masterfully portrayed through character development and use of mirrors throughout the film. The very first shot in Psycho is zooming in from an open view of the city where it is a bright and sunny day. As the shot zooms in further and further it comes into a dark and shaded room that shows Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) and Sam Loomis (John Gavin) having an affair in a undisclosed hotel. This is dualistic image is just one example of many that Hitchcock has placed in this film. Marion Crane is the first main character that is focused upon for the first half of Psycho. â€Å"All that Marion Wants, after all, are the humble treasures of love, marriage, home, and†¦show more content†¦Marion’s death is very symbolic and dualistic in a multitude of ways. â€Å"The fact that Marion is nonetheless murdered after her self-realization suggests that neither she nor the society that produced her is recuperable† (Gottlieb, Brookhouse 362) [Christopher Sharrett 362] Once Marion had made that fatal mistake to become a criminal, she was destined to die as a criminal, with no chance of salvation. This is very dualistic of the ending of the frontier, which was right around the time Psycho was produced. â€Å"the movement of the film is steadily downward and inward, away from the feeling of daylight, abundance, and expanse to a nightmarish claustrophobia that exteriorizes the unconscious mind.† (Gottlieb, Brookhouse 362) [Christopher Sharrett 362] The image of the West being a gigantic open expanse was coming to an end and Hitchcock showed that the frontier was finished and there was no chance of it coming back. Hitchcock places a large amount of dualism between the characters of Marion, Sam, Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins), and Lila Crane (Vera Miles). â€Å"The first couple, Sam and Marion, engenders the second, Norman and Marion: Norman has thus taken the place of Sam. Yet he has actually, diegetically speaking, taken the place of Marion, given the mirror dialectic between the sexes and their psychic structurations.† (Deutalbaum, Poague 357) [Bellour 357] The couple of Marion and Sam never got a chance to be married, but as the film goes through theShow MoreRelatedThe Horrifying Shower Scene in Alfred Hitchcocks Film, Psycho1660 Words   |  7 PagesIn this essay I will be doing a close analysis on the famous shower scene in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho, 1960. I will be looking at the mise-en-scà ¨ne, performance, cinematography, editing, and the manipulation of sound. I will also be looking at themes that are explored in the film and what messages they convey to the audience. I will be using some theories to help analyze this particular sequence. At the beginning of the clip we can see the Marion flushing pieces of paper down the toilet in a close

Training Day - Police Corruption Misconduct free essay sample

Unfortunately, this attitude develops from not being checked, and leads to the unit leaning as though they are untouchable. When not having checks and balances is coupled with a leader who exhibits signs of misconduct, the potential for more massive amounts of corruption and misconduct are more likely as portrayed in the movie Training Day starring Denned Washington as a corrupt MARC unit commander. The most common types of police misconduct include excessive force, sexual assault, intentional false arrest, falsifying evidence, extortion, and other related offenses (Color 2000).Police misconduct has become more prevalent since 970 when drugs became a major driver of corruption replacing gambling, prostitution and alcohol (Bayle 2011). Public activists groups and internal affairs units are put in place in law enforcement agencies which primarily govern police misconduct investigations by officers under the Deprivation of Right under Color of Law, Title 18, US Code, Section 242, (Color 2000). There are important factors to focus on to help understand and prevent officer misconduct, including officers integrity, positive leadership, and continuing ethical boundaries long after the hiring process. However, this scrutiny should not prevent police officers from effectively doing their Jobs and seeking a peace officer career. Theories on the role of society in law enforcement, the negative influence of an officers department, and a persons own natural tendency to engage in unethical behavior have been offered as explanations of police corruption (Martin 2011). Therefore, producing an honest and ethical officer is essential to prevent misconduct and corruption in any department.It is also imperative for each individual who is placed into a position where they are ranted extreme discretionary powers to encompass personal and professional integrity. A list of characteristics important for officers to possess integrity include; prudence, trust, effacement of self-interests, courage, intellectual honesty, Justice and responsibility (Martin 2011). When a person internalizes these characteristics and upholds the law with integrity, the probability of corruption is far less likely to occur.Even when a person portrays strong characteristics of integrity and desires to uphold the law in an ethical fashion, they may feel the pressure to succumb to fellow officers n order to fit into an exclusive subculture. A subculture is a group of individuals who generally share attitudes, perceptions, assumptions, values, beliefs, ways of living, and traditions. Because police work entails so many experiences unique to the field, the subculture can become stronger than the officers own family ties.Conflicts can, and more than likely, will arise when personnel face a choice between what may be ethically right and their devotion to the other members of their subgroup. Such a strong loyalty toward fellow officers causes members to trade their integrity for that allegiance. One conclusion would be that the length of time an officer is exposed to t his colonization process, the greater its impact. When this loyalty to the subculture becomes too strong, the unity that follows can adversely affect the ethical values of the officers (Martin 2011).This type of work environment causes officers to feel like they are doing what is wanted by their organizations and the public and the officers may continue with the behavior because the pressure to produce results is greater than that to follow the rules. A law enforcement department might choose to punish n individual, but the fear of punishment usually is not enough to change unwanted behavior (Martin 2011). With all of the temptation, attempts to fit into a subculture, and desire to please superiors, mentoring younger officers becomes extremely important.Mentoring can either allow corruption to spread, or it can be also be nipped in the bud. With these issues at hand, it is important that law enforcement agencies invest in upstanding supervisors and leaders in their departments because according to statistics, leaders have a signifi cant impact in preventing corruption and Hereford play a significant role in the agencies in which they serve. Therefore, it becomes imperative that effective leaders who share the same goals be in place to set the standard for subordinates to see and emulate (Martin 2011). However; while leaders certainly play a critical role in forming the future leaders and overall atmosphere of the organization, they alone cannot ensure that high levels of integrity are continually maintained. Since supervisors are not typically involved unless a complaint against an officer or a serious incident requires their response they are to generally aware of everything that happens in the field on a daily basis. Although it might be mandatory for leaders to provide an environment that encourages proper ethical conduct, it falls upon each member of the organization to ensure that this standard of integrity is carried out.Temptation is always going to be a part of human nature no matter what career someone has, but its important for those in law enforcement to harness the temptation and tap into the integral part of themselves. It has been proven that those who engage in criminal conduct do so as a matter of secularity and we rarely see a person commit a first time offense wi thout repeating it and unfortunately police officers are immune from this statistic.However; even police officers with strong ethics and upstanding integrity who perform their duties well, should still expect allegations of police misconduct at some point in their careers because criminals dont live at the same standards as an officer should. However, officers can prevent most misconduct complaints if they conduct themselves in a professional manner and write detailed, accurate reports. While cost officers exercise good Judgment in crisis situations, they often do not adequately record their actions (Color 2000) which can open doors for civil suits and lead to bureaucratic questioning.

The Very Old Man With Enormous Wings Essays - Angel,

The Very Old Man With Enormous Wings Response to essay on The Very Old Man With Enormous Wings What does this piece reveal about people's attitudes towards religion? Why do the townspeople treat the old man in the way that they do? Do they respond differently to the spider girl than to the old man? Is there evidence that he is really an angel? Does that make a difference? Why is the subtitle of the piece A Tale for Children? Why would children be the intended audience for this piece? Is it intended to be educational? If so, in what way? Explain the ending a bit more. What does this piece have to do with life after death as you bring up in your essay? Is an angel the same as a ghost? What is an angel? What purpose are they thought to serve in human life? Does this angel serve that purpose? If not, does he serve any purpose? Does he fail at his objective? Explain. Why is the piece called A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings rather than An Angel? Any suggestions? Do the people exploit him? Explain. Any connection between the old man's arrival and the child's recovery? Is it simply coincidence? How do you respond to the parents' displaying the old man to make money off of him? What does that say about them, about their attitudes towards religion, towards God's work.